internet link to the University of Minnesota Northwest Research and Outreach Center in Crookston

 

 







 

Cropping Issues Newsletter
News Items from NW Minnesota Extension Staff
On-Farm Cropping Trials: NW and West Central MN
 
Other Information Sources

Crop e News from University of Minnesota Extension Service

 

 

 

 

 

Volume 5 Issue 7     July 1, 2008

Crop Health Studies: Effect of Fungicides on
    Soybean Plant Health / Yield in Northwest MN

Soybean leaf rust was first detected in the US in 2004. Fungicides will help to control leaf rust. In the mean time, fungicides were promoted for their overall benefit through enhancing plant health, even in the absence of disease. As a result, replicated field trials were conducted to determine if any benefits from fungicide use on soybean would translate into yield increases within the region. This study was designed to determine whether benefits from applying Headline (pyraclostrobin) or Folicur (tebuconazol) fungicides at the R1 and R3 stage would promote “plant health” and possibly result in increased yields for growers in northwest Minnesota.

In general, no visual differences in the treatments were observed. At the northern location in 2006, control plots appeared to lose their leaves quicker, however defoliation estimates at the end of August were not significantly different between treatments.

Soybean Plant Health study results for northwest MinnesotaYield results do not indicate a statistically significant yield increase occurred from applying fungicides at either growth stage or at any location during the two years that trials were conducted (Table 1).

In 2006, overall yields were lower at the Kragnes site when compared to the other locations. This difference may be the result of two minor hail events which occurred in late August and mid September at the Kragnes site. Yields at Shelly were suppressed in 2007 due to excessive wet soils which delayed development in some plots.

Soybean aphids reached treatable levels at southern locations in 2006 and were controlled with an insecticide application. When aphids were treated, all plots were treated similarly. Aphids did not require treatment in 2007 at any of the sites.

From NW regional studies conducted between 2004 - 2007, which includes trials conducted by NDSU, we conclude that foliar fungicides, applied to soybeans in the absence of infections of foliar diseases, did not produce statistically significant yield increases. Other replicated trials conducted in southern locations of Minnesota have produced similar results. To see the results of these and other trials from southeast and southwest Minnesota, go to:

http://www.soybeans.umn.edu/regional/Southeast/index.htm  

http://swroc.cfans.umn.edu/SWMNPEST/swmnpest.htm  

Do we need to use Foliar fungicides in northwest Minnesota or North Dakota? Probably not, but there could be exceptions. If you are still interested in trying them, ALWAYS leave check strips that would provide a valid comparison, not just untreated areas on field edges. What about for soybean rust control? In the event that we experience the arrival of Soybean Rust spores, the decision to use fungicides will depend on growth stage of the crop when rust spores arrive. If the crop has progressed past R6, then fungicides would not be needed.

This project was funded by the Minnesota Soybean Research
and Promotion Council.

Phillip Glogoza
Extension Educator, Crops

Return to Table of Contents

Home   General Info   Research Areas   Weather  Staff   Calendar  Search 

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last Updated:  July 02, 2008