Volume
3 Issue 7
July
5, 2006
Soybean Aphids –
When and What to Spray?? A Real Juggling Act
As most of you already know, this was the earliest
appearance we’ve had of soybean aphid in the RRV. And that’s
affecting the population dynamics and the management of this insect
pest. Some fields in the central RRV are already at or above the
treatment threshold of 250 aphids/plant and aphid populations are
continuing to build. Most of our fields have just started to flower
and, if the weather cooperates, still have a lot of growth to
complete. Treating early in the season is not something we’ve
typically had to deal with in NW MN or in ND; early treatment
decisions require juggling a lot of variables ….
Temperatures -
Temperature influences soybean aphid management decisions.
Studies on the reproduction of soybean aphid indicate their
reproduction decreases steadily as the temperature rises above 85F.
This can impact management decisions. Remember, soybean aphids
reproduce by producing live young, all of which are females and
ready to reproduce their own daughters in 7 days. Consequently,
aphid populations can increase very quickly.
Between 90-95F, soybean aphid reproduction stops, their mortality
increases, and their feeding decreases (but does not stop). But this
effect is reversed when the temperature drops. So if daytime
temperatures are in the 90’s, there will be less aphid reproduction
and feeding, but expect both to continue in the evening and mornings
when the temperature is below 90-95F. It’s a matter of average
temperatures; days in the 90s may result in less aphid population
growth, but don’t expect them to disappear unless our daily average
temperatures exceed 90-95F for several days.
High temperatures also impact the efficacy of some insecticides.
Temperatures over 90F significantly decrease both the immediate
toxicity and half-life (the period of time it takes a chemical to
break down to half it’s original amount) of synthetic pyrethroid
insecticides (SPs), (e.g. Warrior, Asana XL, Decis 1.5 EC, Proaxis,
Taiga Z, etc). This means if SPs are applied when the temperature is
over 90F, they won’t provide the control they do when temperatures
are below 90F. If they’re applied when the temperature is in the
80’s and then the temperature rises above 90, they won’t provide the
extended aphid suppression because their half-life is decreased.
Temperatures of 90-95F have little or no effect on organophosphate
insecticides (OPs), (e.g. Lorsban 4E, Penncap-M, Orthene, etc).
Extended Suppression –
The SPs have been shown to generally provide longer suppression
of aphid populations than do most OPs. Although influenced by
environmental conditions, UMN trials most consistently show SPs
suppressing re-infestation of soybeans by aphids for 10-14 days,
some conditions have resulted in even longer suppression. Our
research indicates this is probably the result of direct residual
toxicity but is more likely a repellency effect.
The top performing insecticides in both classes provide the same
rates of initial mortality, but the OPs seem to work more quickly
(i.e. as many aphids will die when treated with a good SP as with a
good OP, but it will take longer for them to die). Likewise, we
haven’t seen a difference in yields between the top performers in
either class.
Typically in the RRV, we get our aphid populations in the early
reproductive stages and are most likely to treat around R4.
Currently, most local fields are at early R1, just starting to
flower. This influences management decisions in two ways; 1) we have
had impacting populations of soybean aphids develop as late as
mid-July, if this happens this year, fields treated with SPs in late
July may not have enough extended suppression to prevent treatable
populations from developing again later, and 2) any new plant
material added after application, and hopefully there’ll be a lot of
it, will not be protected and will be vulnerable to aphid
infestation and population growth.
Precipitation –
A heavy rain event may temporarily set aphid populations back and
recovery time often varies for the population. In UMN plots we’ve
experienced recovery by populations within days and other times it
has taken a week or so. This is heavily influenced by environmental
conditions (see temperature and aphid reproduction above). Dry
conditions have also been associated with spider mite problems in
soybeans, but they are a relatively uncommon pest in NW MN. Spider
mites tend to crowd soybean aphids out if the aphid populations are
not well established and mite populations can be flared by SP
insecticides.
Product Warranties –
A number of companies have offered
warranties this season on using their products against soybean
aphids. These may represent very good opportunities for those who
need to treat aphids early in the season. Warranties for different
products have various timing requirements (i.e. the date after which
the product must be applied or the length of time for which
sub-threshold populations will be maintained) and most require using
the higher label rates. In most years, it’s unlikely in NW MN and NE
ND that re-application will be required.
However, the
earlier a field is treated, the more likely it is that field will
require re-treatment later in the season.
As application date progresses
through the season, there’s less time for re-infestation and
population growth. It should be noted that in most cases warranties
cover only product and not the application costs, so it is not
necessarily a good decision to spray early when aphids are still
below threshold populations simply because of the warranty.
Although
soybean aphids are relatively well distributed in the area,
populations still vary field to field, and spray decisions must be
made accordingly. Some fields, with slower developing populations,
may not exceed threshold until later in the season and may not have
as high a risk of re-infestation as fields requiring treatment in
early July. Product warranties may provide an excellent opportunity
for growers whose fields are currently over threshold,
but it remains a field by field decision.
Bottom Line –
Evaluate fields individually for thresholds and
assess if warranties may offer an opportunity. If the temperature
is or is going to soon be above 90F, you may want to select an
organophosphate rather than a synthetic pyrethroid. Applying even a
synthetic pyrethroid early in the season may not preclude
re-infestation and a second treatment (lots of time in the season
and hopefully lots unprotected plant material yet to come). Aphid
populations are increasing and even high daily temperatures of 95F
don’t necessarily mean the populations will stop (it’s still cooler
in the morning and evening).
Ian MacRae, Extension Entomologist
U of Minnesota, NWROC
|