Volume
3 Issue 6
June
27, 2006
Aphids, Aphids Everywhere!! – June 28, 2006
The dry conditions and moderate temperatures over the weekend
have been ideal for wheat maturation. Unfortunately, they’ve
also been terrific for aphid population growth! Both cereal
aphid and soybean aphid populations in the central & northern RRV
continue to rise.
Cereal
Aphids - the later planted fields are at greatest risk of
yield loss. Fields that are in flag or early boot stage still
have considerable development ahead of them and the standard
recommendation continues to apply: spray as soon as a field reaches
threshold (80% - 85% of stems with at least one aphid per stem).
The current conditions and the immediate forecast continue to
favor aphid reproduction and aphid numbers may continue to rise. In
Univ. of Minnesota trials, treating aphids at heading produced an
economic return in only two trials – both occurred in years with
heavy populations that had been steadily growing over a period of
time. In both circumstances, greater returns were seen with earlier
treatments.
There are several fields in the central RRV that may fit these
criteria. For every 100 cumulative Aphid Days, the yield loss
is estimated to be approximately 0.6 bu/ac. This rate of yield loss
decreases as the plant matures for a number of reasons:
physiological changes in the plant and maturation of the grain make
it less susceptible to aphid damage, after heading the plant starts
to become less suitable as a host, aphid populations start to
decline, and natural mortality factors, such as predators, start to
impact the population so that aphid populations generally start to
decline within 2 weeks after heading. From heading on, there
usually isn’t enough time to accumulate sufficient aphid days to
cause the amount of yield loss that would economically justify an
insecticide application. HOWEVER the very heavy populations in
combination with the current conditions of dry weather and cooler
temperatures may allow enough aphid days to accumulate to provide an
economic.
The Bottom Line – If plants are pre-heading and at threshold,
then immediate treatment is recommended, don’t wait until heading!
If plants are headed, the standard recommendation is not to treat,
the exception is if very heavy populations exist a treatment might
produce an economic return (100 Aphid Days = ~0.6 bu/ac loss).
Also remember to check the label for Pre-Harvest Intervals!!
Soybean
Aphids - Yesterday I saw a 100 ac soybean field that
requires treatment; over 90% of plants in this field were infested
with soybean aphids exceeding 300/plant on average (and some with
far more than 300/plant). This was apparently a field in which
soybean aphids showed up very early in the season and it had a
sub-threshold population evenly distributed across the field
It’s time to scout for soybean aphids!! Keep a close eye on
fields with evenly distributed populations!!
The early appearance and development of soybean aphid populations
and the high cost of fuel may make it tempting to tank-mix
insecticides with upcoming herbicide applications, especially one of
the synthetic pyrethroids which may provide extended aphid
suppression. If the field is already at or near threshold
(250/plant) and aphid populations are increasing, fine. BUT if
you’re hoping to get season long aphid suppression, it’s a risky
gamble and may have a low probability of paying off!
Be aware: in UMN trials only the high label rates provided
extended soybean aphid suppression and the length of suppression
most consistently encountered was only 10-14 days. After this,
results were less consistent and may have been influenced by
environmental conditions. In addition, the plants now are still
relatively small but are rapidly growing - after the upcoming
herbicide application, soybeans will continue to grow, adding a lot
of new plant material, all of which will be unprotected by
insecticide residue and open to immediate re-infestation by aphids.
Fuel and chemical costs may also make border treatment seem
attractive. Although there is some data to indicate that soybean
aphids do preferentially colonize field borders in western MN and in
ND, this appears to be relatively transitory. Soybean aphids do not
appear to be restricted at the field’s edge long enough for border
treatments to be a viable control. By the time populations at field
borders are large enough to treat, isolated populations are
generally present throughout the field. This year especially,
populations are relatively well-distributed across fields (although
still in low numbers in many locations). Treating just the borders
will not prevent populations that are established within the fields
from developing and spreading throughout the field and may require
re-treatment of the entire field.
Ian MacRae, U of MN Entomologist
NWROC, Crookston
|