Volume
3 Issue 4
June
13, 2006
What’s Happening with Soybean Rust ?
National Soybean Rust Commentary
(updated: 06/06/06)
Scouting
has intensified in soybean sentinel plots especially in
the south. Most of the soybean sentinel plots have been
planted throughout the country with plants in some early
planted plots starting to reach maturity. Scouting
continues on kudzu patches from Florida to the north as
far away as Nebraska. A recent limited survey of kudzu in
Florida found no evidence of abundant infection or
sporulation. Currently, there are no known reports of rust
on commercially planted soybean in 2006. Rust has been
confirmed in five counties in Alabama, 11 in Florida, four
in Georgia, and one in Texas. Many of the Southern states
are experiencing hotter and drier than normal conditions
reducing the likelihood of viable spore dispersal. A
report regarding Mexico indicated that rust had occurred
earlier in the year (winter season seed production) before
any commercial soybeans were planted in Mexico or the U.S.
Spore trapping continues throughout the U.S. using both
active and passive traps. Any positive spore trap
information does not imply infection has taken place and
plant samples are used exclusively for indicating positive
rust occurrence as indicated on the soybean rust
observation map.
A few comments on the April rust reports from Mexico.
These reports centered on the Mexican states of Tamaulipas
and San Luis Potosi, which are located on the gulf coast
just south of Brownsville, TX (Figure 1). Though further
comments and discussion regarding the Mexico situation
have been quiet, it is known that no rust has been
confirmed in Texas where dryer than normal weather is
occurring and therefore not conducive to soybean rust
development.
Why
concern about Texas and Mexico? Wind patterns that affect
Minnesota are more likely to flow through Mexico and Texas
during the summer. These routes may provide a more direct
route to Minnesota when compared to weather patterns
passing through southeastern states. Perhaps, soybean rust
will follow the known pathway of other rust diseases, such
as cereal leaf rust (Puccinia triticina).
Local Reports for Minnesota and North Dakota
In Minnesota, 25 soybean rust sentinel plots have been
established in 2006. Placement of the plots throughout the
state is based on distribution of soybean acreage and
expected environmental conditions that may favor soybean
rust. The sentinel plots are located in the following
counties: Blue Earth, Dakota, Freeborn, Goodhue, Houston,
Jackson, Marshall, McLeod, Nicollet, Nobles, Norman,
Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Ramsey, Redwood,
Renville, Sibley, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Waseca (2), and
Wilkin. Scouting has begun in many of the sentinel plots.
Leaf samples will be collected from each plot throughout
the season and sent to a central laboratory at the
University of Minnesota in St. Paul for analysis and
diagnosis. There appears to be no foreseeable significant
risk of soybean rust developing in Minnesota at any time
in the near future.
In North Dakota, Soybean plants within the state are at
97% planted and 68% emerged according to USDA-NASS-ND.
Growth stages currently range from not emerged to V2.
Sentinel plot plantings have completed and monitoring will
begin soon. Currently, no scouting or management for
soybean rust is required in North Dakota.
INFORMATIVE SOYBEAN RUST WEBSITES:
USDA Soybean Rust Public Information
http://www.sbrusa.net/
North American Plant Disease Forecast Center
http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/pp/soybeanrust/
Soybean Rust Pest Tracker
http://ceris.purdue.edu/napis/pests/asbr/index.html
|