Twospotted
spider mites (Figure
1) are present in our field crops every year. Under
certain circumstances, their populations can increase dramatically
and result in significant yield losses. Two important conditions
that favor their buildup include:
- hot dry weather, and
- use of insecticides.
The widespread need to manage soybean aphid and the continued
droughty weather will put the region at greater risk for mite
population increases. The following information is intended to
provide a better understanding of spider mite biology, why our risks
for problems will escalate, and what management
decisions
should be considered.
Description:
Twospotted spider mites are distributed worldwide. They are not
insects; they are closely related to spiders They have an extensive
host plant range that includes soybean, dry edible bean, alfalfa,
corn, and others from our region. Mites are very small at a length
of only 2/100th of an inch (0.3 to 0.4 mm). Mites range in color
from pale yellow to green to orange. Two dark spots are visible
through the transparent body. The eggs are round and yellow (Figure
1). Though mites are best seen with magnification, they
can be seen with the unaided eye. This is best done by tapping an
infested leaf over a white surface. The mites appear to be small
dust specks, but they will actively move about. Crushing the small
mites will leave a small, reddish-brown spot on the white surface.
Life Cycle:
All the life stages of the twospotted spider mite occur on plants.
They overwinter in the region as adult females in plant material.
They migrate to plants in the spring by walking or when aided by
wind which catches them while they congregate on the top leaves of a
plant. The adult females lay eggs on the undersides of leaves.
Females can lay from 2 to 6 eggs/day. Fertilized eggs produce
females; unfertilized eggs produce males. Eggs hatch in 4 to 14
days. Temperatures in the low 90’s F are optimum for reproduction.
They hatch as a six-legged nymph, followed by two eight-legged
nymphal stages. Time from egg to adult is dependent on temperature
and can be as short as 4 days.
Plant
Injury:
Spider mites feed by inserting their styletlike mouthparts
into leaf cells. The contents of these individual cells are removed.
The resulting symptom is white or yellow spots referred to as
stippling (Figure
2). It can be seen on both upper and lower surfaces of
the leaf. As mite populations increase, injured leaves are
susceptible to water loss at the feeding wound
sites.
The combination of feeding, water and heat stress can turn leaves
yellow to brown in color. Spider mites also produce webbing. This
webbing is often visible on heavily infested leaves, trapping dust
that makes plants look very dry and dirty (Figure
3).
more photos of plant injury . . .

Field Monitoring:
When environmental conditions favor the increase in mite
populations, monitoring fields for their presence and assessing
plant damage levels is strongly recommended. Often initial
infestations are along field margins. Look for mites on the leaves
in the lower to middle canopy. To confirm the presence of mites, use
a 10x hand lens or tap leaves over a sheet of white paper. Assessing
damage will be more of a challenge. Generally, the attempt to assess
leaf area loss is recommended. Estimating green leaf area lost to
mite feeding can be done by estimating leaves lost, or potentially
lost, as a percentage of the whole. This would be a similar approach
to estimates that are made to assess leaf loss when grasshoppers or
bean leaf beetle are munching holes in leaves.
Treatment Decisions:
Treating for spider mites can be a testy decision. The environmental
conditions that favor mite infestations are not the best for optimum
soybean yields. In addition, when conditions continue to favor
mites, multiple treatments may be required to keep the infestations
suppressed. Unfortunately, most of our treatment decisions in the
next few weeks will be driven more by aphids. The spider mites will
be a second consideration, though an important one when it comes to
the selection of an insecticide.
The economic threshold is not well defined for spider mites.
Keeping in mind that a leaf loss of 20 to 30% during pod fill can
reduce yields, it is necessary to back that off to a lower value to
avoid actual losses. University of Illinois entomologist Dr. Mike
Gray has recommended a treatment timing when 10 to 15% of the
leaves are discolored during pod fill. You can read more
details on justification for this threshold in the 2005 Pest
Management and Crop Bulletin newsletter at:
http://www.ipm.uiuc.edu/bulletin/article.php?id=354
Natural control:
Spider mite populations are often suppressed through natural
biological control agents. Predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae)
colonize the same plants and feed on the twospotted mites. The aphid
predators such as Lady beetles, minute pirate bugs, and lacewing
also feed on mites. Unfortunately, insecticide applications will
disrupt all these predator species.
The most important biological control agent is the fungal
pathogen, Neozygites floridana. Spores from the fungus attach
to the mite’s body, germinate, and infect the body. Infection leads
to death in 1 to 3 days. Environmental conditions necessary for the
fungus to be active are temperatures cooler than 85 F and humidity
of at least 90% for periods of 12 to 24 hours. Rain itself does not
trigger the fungal infections; the resulting high humidity
is still necessary. When conditions are not favorable for the
fungus, infected, dead mites become the resting source, housing the
fungus until environmental conditions trigger the resumption of
growth and spore release. When epizootics occur, they can reduce
populations of mites very rapidly.
Insecticide Selection:
Comments have already been made by other authors about the
importance of proper insecticide selection when mites are a concern.
The
pyrethroids (e.g., Asana, Asana, Baythroid, Decis, Mustang Max,
Proaxis, Taiga, Warrior) kill off the natural enemies that help
control spider mites, stimulate movement of the mites, spreading the
infestation, and there is some data from orchard systems to indicate
they may increase the reproductive rate of existing female mites and
increase the number of females being born into the population
(again, raising the reproductive rate of the colony). This worsening
of mite infestations can occur in as little as 7-10 days after
application. The organophosphate (OP) insecticides (e.g., dimethoate,
chlorpyrifos - Lorsban and Yuma, Penncap-M) have provided a better
kill rate, and are a better choice for mite management. However,
there is still a risk of continued problems when environmental
conditions remain hot and dry. To illustrate the difference between
OP and pyrethroid insecticides, a small study conducted in 2005
comparing an OP (Lorsban) and a pyrethroid (Asana) resulted in 99+%
control of mites by the OP while the pyrethroid had populations
equal to or significantly greater than the untreated check (Figure
4).
Another question that is quite popular now is whether there is
benefit to mixing a pyrethroid and an organophosphate?
If aphids are the only concern, probably not.
Where aphids and mites are an issue, then yes. Lorsban does
well on both aphids and mites and should provide the best control
with a single insecticide. If there is
need for mite control under the industry incentive programs
where pyrethroids are being used for a
second time, the
treatments would probably be enhanced
in their performance with the addition of Lorsban. In this
situation, a lower rate of Lorsban at the
8 oz/a rate would be expected to provide adequate results (2
EE label issued 4/15/05), though follow-up scouting
is highly recommended to assess future infestation levels.
Phillip Glogoza, REE - Crops, Moorhead Regional
Center
and
Ian MacRae, Extension Entomologist, NWROC