internet link to the University of Minnesota Northwest Research and Outreach Center in Crookston

 

 







 

Cropping Issues Newsletter
News Items from NW Minnesota Extension Staff
On-Farm Cropping Trials: NW and West Central MN
 
Other Information Sources

Crop e News from University of Minnesota Extension Service

 

 

 

 

 

Volume 2 Issue 6     June 28, 2005

Drift Injury on Soybean and
Interactions with Scheduled Postemergence Herbicides

As fields of small grain, sugarbeet, and corn recover from wet conditions, you will quickly see spray rigs actively treating fields with herbicides. Too frequently, as you are driving in the region you can smell herbicides from your vehicle before you see the sprayer, as applications are being made in wind conditions that are less than ideal. Unfortunately, soybean is very susceptible to drift from plant growth regulator (PGR) herbicides used in many tank mixes.

Plant growth regulator (PGR) injury to soybeans.Drift injury on soybean is frequently from PGR herbicides such as Stinger, Curtail, 2,4-D, Clarity and a host of products that contain these same active ingredients. Symptoms from PGR injury include leaf cupping, strapping, and puckering (Figure 1). Depending on the severity of injury the plants may also be stunted, delayed in maturity, brittle, and appear to have a profusion of leaves from the upper part of the plant as the internodes have been shortened.

Plant growth regulator herbicide effect on yield.A recent article in Weed Science by Kelly et. al. (2005) discusses the influence of selected PGR herbicides on soybean at various stages development. They applied the herbicides at reduced rates to simulate amounts common/possible in drift situations. The herbicide rates ranged from 0.1 to 3.2 % of the high labeled rates of Clarity, Distinct and Stinger used in corn and from 10 to 32 % of the high labeled rate of 2,4-D. This study found that soybean is the most sensitive to Clarity followed by Stinger and Distinct and is least sensitive to 2,4-D. Others have reported that injury occurring at reproductive stages have a higher probability of reduced yields, however, this study shows the potential for yield loss is just as high at V3 developmental stage as at the R2 stage (Table 1).    

Soybean injury and effect from interaction with herbicides and drift rate of Clarity.To us, the more interesting part of this research looked at the interaction between a drift rate of Clarity applied with normal rates of herbicides used on soybean (Table 2). Kelly et. al. found that soybean injury was more severe when Clarity plus the soybean herbicide was applied than the level of injury you would expect by adding the injuries from Clarity and the other herbicide applied by themselves (synergy). This synergistic increase in injury was evident even six weeks after application with treatments containing Pursuit, Raptor and Flexstar. The increase in injury also resulted in reduced yields with Pursuit and Raptor one of two years and was observed both years with Flexstar (data not shown). There was not a synergistic effect with Clarity and glyphosate to reduce yield (although they did observe some increased visual injury at the V7 stage of development in 2003).

This research indirectly addresses an important management issue that occurs when producers have experienced early season drift injury from a PGR herbicide but have not made their postemergence weed control applications. What should he do? Delay his postemergence application to allow the soybean plants to recover from the drift injury (result: larger weeds) or make the herbicide application while weeds are still small. This research suggests that with a Roundup Ready variety there is not much additional risk by making a glyphosate application whenever you can get in the field. But, with conventional herbicides (especially Flexstar) you risk additional yield loss by not allowing the plants to begin to recover.

It is difficult to predict the yield response to damage from PGR herbicides on soybean because environmental conditions and a many other factors influence the plants ability to recover from the injury. However, this research suggests that we need to be careful when managing soybeans with PGR herbicide injury so we don’t increase injury to the soybean plants and possibly increase yield loss.

 

Literature Cited:

Kelley, K.B., L.M. Wax, A.G. Hager, and D. E. Riechers. 2005 Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other postemergence herbicides Weed Sci: 53:101–112.

Carlyle Holen U of M IPM Specialist
and
Doug Holen, Regional Extension Educator

Return to June 28, 2005 Table of Contents

Home   General Info   Research Areas   Weather  Staff   Calendar  Search 

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last Updated:  December 08, 2005